Friday, September 7, 2012

The Gold Rush Review

“The Gold Rush” is a silent film that was produced in 1952. Its unique portrayal of the Klondike Gold Rush was created by Charles Chaplin. Chaplin was and remains to be a cultural icon, but his reputation as an actor contains a comedic element (which is almost impossible to ignore.) How could he, as a seemingly light-hearted, comedic artist mimic a world full of strife and desperation? The reliably innovative “Charlie” Chaplin made the simple decision to add nothing other than a comedic element. Though this was a simple decision, however, it could not have been a simple process. Tragedy and comedy are not exactly complementary colors.
Taking a look at his personal life, we can begin to understand how he was able to accomplish such a feat. According to the Official Charlie Chaplin Website, his parents were talented performers, therefore, he had a natural taking to acting beginning at a young age. Not only did he have experience with performance, but he also had experience with devastation. Before he reached ten years, Charlie’s father passed away, and his mother became ill shortly thereafter. As a result, Charlie and his brother Sydney were forced to fend for themselves. This need to survive and deal with heartache and sudden independence quickly afforded Charlie attention from the public for his ability to dance.
We fast-forward in time to when Charlie embarks on making this comedic tragedy, “The Gold Rush”. In order to do this, Chaplin had to use his long-lived independence and light-heartedness to his advantage. By adding an essential element to the film, romance, he was more successful at achieving his desired tone. Chaplin’s character, “The Lone Prospector” falls in love at a dance with the character, “Georgia.” “The Lone Prospector represents not just any man who endured the hardship of the Gold Rush, but a benevolently aimless man traveling with an eye of wonder. Even when the prospector is given a large amount of gold, he still isn’t quite satisfied without the woman whom he adores. This would be a direct contrast to the character of a typical person desperately searching for riches in the cold Arctic mountains.
                  Pretending to scale Arctic Mountains, however, was not the personal hardship Charlie had to mask. In his search for a lead lady, he chose the fifteen year old, Lillita MacMurray, whom he had worked with in a previous film of his, “The Kid”. After shooting for “The Gold Rush” began, however, Lillita (Lita Grey) found out she was pregnant with Charlie’s child. Shooting had to be postponed for three months, and Charlie had to find a new lead woman. His love life’s affect on his work life may have provided some of the real emotions permeating through the film.
 This character development urges viewers to speculate that the Prospector was never actually searching for material riches. The aimless wanderer may have been searching for riches within all along (the riches of love). With this implication and with the help of comedic elements and his enigmatic, romantic personality, Chaplin probably intended for his audience to understand a theme to this story: that no external richness can compare to the internal richness felt for another person.

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have a very interesting take on Chaplin’s character. If the Lone Prospector was not searching for gold like the rest of, what seemed to be, America, then why was he in Alaska in the first place? I do agree that the Lone Prospector wanted more than gold, but I am not sure he went to Alaska to look for love. Could he not find love somewhere else? What was the draw to come to Alaska if he was not seeking wealth in the form of gold? I did find myself laughing, or cracking a smile, multiple times throughout this movie. Even though The Gold Rush is a silent film, the facial expressions and the comedic skills of the actors were amazing. The plot was a bit difficult to follow the first time I watched it, but the second time I viewed the film I was able to pay closer attention to the story line itself, the interactions between the characters, and the relationships that developed, or were disclosed, between the characters.
      Your comment about tragedy and comedy not exactly being complimentary colors confused me a little. I have a hard time seeing the “tragedy” aspect of The Gold Rush. Is it that he was not able to express his emotions and feelings he had for Georgia fully to her? Or that he was made fun of by the townspeople? The girls did not show up for dinner on New Year’s Eve? I do not really see the tragedy aspect of The Gold Rush.

      --Rachel

      Delete
  2. I like the idea of approaching the film from the position that The Lone Prospector was never truly searching for material riches. One could support this argument from his aimless entry into the film, his lack of a compass and misdirection, along with his ill-prepared clothing. He simply appears and is somehow associated with the ongoing events. The role of The Lone Prospector, one might argue, is a larger, likely cohesive existence in the film. He is there to represent the catalyst between scenes, characters and the narrative in general. Chaplin was genius in that way and this character emphasizes on that raw ability to portray a narrative quality using the most basic of abilities, relying on the audience to interpret the significance of the character and all the auxiliary facets included.

    ReplyDelete